Free Cleaning Kit ($20 value) with any Camelbak pack over $49 at RockCreeck.com
Top

Defining What a Running Challenge Means

September 17, 2009 · Written by Sergio Fernandez · Filed Under Articles 
Tags:

Sergio Fernández - Jungle Marathon 2004I recently learnt about some skiers who crossed the Pyrenees unsupported. Not easy, it would have taken them a month at least. Then I read the details of the article in a growing surprise: they hid five food containers along the road, they took a taxi, they had enjoyed saunas and all other “self-sufficiency” sort of things. I have to admit it pissed me off because the word “unsupported” has some very serious connotations. Just ask anyone who has run a race without any external help: the trouble to make the backpack lighter to insanity, starving as never before or miserably sleeping on the floor. Though this is not only applicable to competition, I believe it is fair to tell the others what we do and how we do it. As well as what happens in mountaineering, where you can use oxigen tanks or not, climb with the help of sherpas or do it solo, so we, the runners, have to do it. The judgement about the toughness of each challenge will be in the hands of others, but we have to be honest about how the activity is performed.

That’s why, using the above story as starting point, I’d like to clarify, with the help and colaboration of all of you, how we define the different types of races and challenges some of us are up to. I’d like this to be dinamic and get corrected on what is considered wrong or incomplete, or if someone wants to re-build the list, feel free to do it. Let’s get into it.

Unsupported

To depend on yourself and only yourself. No help except natural resources. Buying stuff in a grocery store is not running unsupported, neither is calling from a phone booth – if you can find one – or get food supply along the way. Given we have grown in a ‘Marathon Des Sables’ world and there’s no way you can carry all the water you need to complete a race, I would accept water supply as long as it is specified beforehand. I would also include a place to sleep as long it is only that, a roof to take shelter. How often you re-supply should be specified, as there’s a significant difference between carrying water for a 10 miles or 25 miles stretch. In personal challenges I accept help from local folks; we are first human beings and second athletes, and turning down water, some food or shelter without asking for it – that’s a key point – would be unpolite and unworthy. As a personal example, I crossed half of Mongolia on a bicycle pulling more than 12pounds. At some point I wasn’t able to call home for more than three days and knowing I wouldn’t in the next four, I accepted a cell phone from a local to call home to let them know I was ok. I think this is the perfect example of what cannot be called unsupported in a strict sense.

Examples of unsupported races are the Marathon des Sables,  The Libyan Challenge, 4Deserts or Jungle Marathon.

Sergio Frenández - Hoggar Marathon 2005

Self-supported

Neither fully supported nor completely ‘on your own’. There are several possibilities here:

  • Self-supported with one re-supply: there are some races where you get support from the organization half way the event. This is the case of the Rock and Ice Ultra or the Trans Aq’. It makes things a little bit easier but the weight you are carrying is 70% that of the fully unsupported. This allows you to amend an error you had with your equipment or change clothes half way through the end.
  • Self-supported in stages: there are races where you get water – or nothing – through the stage and then you have all your stuff in each camp at the end of each day. This is a ‘more athletic and less adventurous’ way of running races. In terms of a personal challenge, you would have your crew at the end of each day to provide you with food and a place to stay overnight (or you would pay for those services along the way in small villages or the like).
  • Self-supported with stashes: applicable only to perosnal challenges, you put out stashes of supplies for yourself prior to the trip with food, clothing or anything else you need. The number of stashes should be announced beforehand as, again, it is not the same one every day than one every three days.

Supported

Any other crossing or competition where you mostly have anything you need in terms of supplies and you can have drop bags in numerous spots along the course. We would have here the Ultra-Trail du Mont Blanc, Badwater, the Transrockies Run or the recent record of Kilian Jornet on the GR20. Though you carry a small waistpack, I’m not sure I would label the UTMB as semi self-sufficiency, as the organization does.

Suggestions, corrections, improvements, amendments,… are all welcome.

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)
Defining What a Running Challenge Means10.0102

Written by Sergio · Sergio maintains the blog ser13gio.blogspot.com and these are the latest posts:
- Way Too Cool 50K 2010
- Off-Topic: Logorama
- Off-Topic: 24h MTB Old Pueblo
Sergio's short bio

Related Posts

Comments

3 Responses to “Defining What a Running Challenge Means”

  1. Will T. on September 17th, 2009 10:33 pm

    I like peter bawkin’s simple definitions on his fastest known time site: http://home.comcast.net/~pbakwin/FKT.html

    I would even call those desert stage races supported. Don’t they supply the tents each night. Along with the medical staff to assist you at the checkpoints along the way. Just my two cents.

  2. Paul on September 20th, 2009 5:17 am

    I think the closest my Spanish, Al Andalus Ultra Trail stage race comes would be Self-supported in stages but I prefer to call it Semi-supported. We only provide water at the check points, runners can travel light with minimum necessary to carry 1.5litres of water, food for stage and very little else apart from personal preferences like whatever they feel they consider a First Aid kit, maybe a long sleeve top. Overnight kit is transported ahead and stage meals are provided.

    The route is tough and the temperatures are high but we finish in or close to villages each day so it would be silly to have everyone carry all their kit and food. Also there is less chance of causing a fire (high risk in July) if runners don’t have the need to cook/carry fuel.. I wanted the event to be a ‘race’ rather than a ‘charity challenge walk’ as I consider the two things should attract different types of competitor.

    My question for additional discussion would be whether there should be time limits in races, should competitors be fit enough to make the final checkpoint within a set time, maybe within a percentage of the leaders time. Should they be ‘forced’ to average a minimum of say 5kph? Should they just be allowed to get round which can leave checkpoint crews on duty for hours longer than necessary if one or two ‘runners’ choose to walk the stage.
    I usually set the slower ‘group’ off an hour before the fastest and this ’split’ is decided upon after second stage but this can also mean an extra long day for check point teams.

    What do you/readers think.

    Adios,
    Paul

  3. Julien on February 11th, 2010 6:19 am

    I mostly agree with your definitions, although I find a little lack of coherence. Why would a phone call be prohibited during an unsupported event, when water and shelter can be supplied? This looks a bit ad-hoc to me, as if this has been specifically written to classify the Marathon des Sables as unsupported. Personally, with all due respect to the toughness of this race, I can hardly consider unsupported an event where tents are water are waiting for you every night.
    I can understand your dilemma with people offering food, shelter or phone call, though. I guess we’re human after all, and we might not be able to fit everything perfectly into simple categories!

Got something to say?





Bottom